| |  View All Videos | |  | | Online Slander: What to Do about It Online slander is never good for an individual or business. Steven Wyer, the founder of Reputation Advocate, knows this first hand since he saw his business and reputation destroyed after false information was spread on the Internet. | |  | |  | | Question About Shopping Results | | By: Sweet Tooth #3 Sometimes, the shopping results in Google appear in the #1 spot, and sometimes they appear in the #8 spot. My question is why? If the shopping results appear in the #1 spot, does that mean that it is a more buyer specific term? But I guess this is the more important question. It seems that shopping results are listed somewhat separate from other organic search results. I mean that, even if a shopping result is displayed, there are also the 10 organic search results displayed on that page. If shopping results are displayed in the #1 spot, is there any way to beat them (with a blog post) through traditional SEO methods? » Reply to this post... | |  |  | Thursday, September 29, 2011 | |  | Google's "Google+ is Google" quote hits the nail on the head Google+ is growing a lot now that it's open to the public. It's worth noting, but there is a much bigger picture in the social media competition conversation than Facebook users vs. Google+ users. Do you use any Google product? If so, you should be counted as a Google+ user. Tell us which Google products you use in the comments. We've often seen stories in the media about how people sign up for Google+, but rarely post. The important nugget of information that often goes unnoticed, however, is that this is generally in reference to public posts, and Google+ VP Product Bradley Horowitz talked about this in an interview with Wired. "We've found there is actually twice as much private sharing as there is sharing that's visible to everyone on the Internet," he said. "That's why sometimes it looks like people sign up and then don't come back. In fact, they're sharing with small groups of people that they trust and love. It's just not publicly visible. So there's this sort of dark matter that the public can't see." Let's not forget that one of the main things people found appealing about Google+ from the onset was the Circles sharing concept - the concept of having more control over who sees what. You're not supposed to see every post from everybody. This isn't Twitter (despite the ability to use it that way). In fact, this concept was so well received that Facebook knew it had to have similar options, which it recently launched. Horowitz also noted that Google has plans to address the issue of people who are not engaging or visiting Google+ enough, though he didn't go into specifics. Perhaps the main point to take away from that interview is that Google+ is simply Google - a point I have brought up numerous times, I might add (even before Google+ was launched). Essentially, the point is that Google as a whole - it's portfolio of products - is the network. Your Google account, regardless of whether you use Google+ itself, makes you a user, because it's all connected, and will be connected in many more ways as time progresses. Google+ - the streams, circles, hangouts, etc. are simply features of the greater Google social network. In Horowitz's own words, "Google+ is Google itself. We're extending it across all that we do—search, ads, Chrome, Android, Maps, YouTube—so that each of those services contributes to our understanding of who you are." There you have it. WHO YOU ARE. I would say it's about who you are on the web, but those lines are getting blurrier by the day. Take Google Wallet, for example. If this becomes as widely adopted as Google hopes, you'll be using it to purchase physical goods at physical stores on a regular basis. This isn't just bout online identity. It's about identity. I'm not saying we're going to be giving up our driver's licences or social security numbers anytime soon, (although Andy Rooney might think that's a good idea). But we are going to be using our online identities for more than just web-related tasks and fun. Google+ is one of many gateways Google has for users to enter the Google universe and have that Google account available as their identity. Google has a tremendous advantage over Facebook in those terms. So many products. So many gateways. With Facebook, you're either a Facebook user or you're not. With Google, you may not be a Google+ users, but you may be a Gmail user or a Google Docs user or a YouTube user, etc. It's all one in the same. That's not to say that Facebook is going to lose any ground here. Facebook already has 800 million users. That's just ridiculous. Facebook has taken a very different path by essentially focusing on one product - the social network (and the platform around it), but they've done it better than anybody. They've done it so well that just about every brand needs to be involved in one way or another, whether it's simply having a page or building apps, connecting content, logins, etc. Facebook did things right when they needed to and blew every competitor in the social network space out of the water, and despite numerous feature additions, redesigns and other changes, there is no indication that it will be losing its spot in the social network chain of command. Despite taking a very different path from Google, the destination is the same - your identity. If you have a Facebook account, you can use it to do a lot of things on the web, and I'd be surprised if you won't be able to do more and more in the physical world with it in the future. There are plenty of other services out there that give you an online identity, but it seems that Google and Facebook are the frontrunners in this department. Twitter will likely get a big boost from iOS and the iPhone 5, due to its heavy integration with the operating system. Apple's launch event is October 4, we'll probably learn more about this at that point, though Facebook is supposed to have some new iOS apps in store as well. Who is in better position to win the identity war? Google or Facebook? Somebody different? Let us know what you think in the comments.  |
No comments:
Post a Comment